Skip to main content

The Film List Project #20: Bring It On

Ready? Okay!

After a few weeks of writing about some particularly heavy movies, I decided to pick a title off the teen movie section of the list. When I realized that Bring It On was still on the list, I was a little appalled. After all, is it really a day in America if Bring It On hasn't played somewhere on cable?

Even though this movie was released in 2000, I consider it an honorary member of the typical '90s teen movie family. Why? Here are just a few of the reasons:

1. One of the decade's most popular blonde actresses in a lead role (Kirsten Dunst)

2. One of the decade's most popular brunette actresses in the edgy, alternative sidekick role (Eliza Dushku)

3. A guy named Jesse with Prince Eric eyebrows playing the book wearing, punk listening, sensitive love interest who says things like, "I made you a tape" (Jesse Bradford)

4. Not-so-subtle product placement (Hey there, Diet Coke!)

5. Not-so-subtle references to now irrelevant pop culture figures (Hey there, Nancy Kerrigan and Sugar Ray!)

I could go on and on. A lot of these '90s movies only live on because of the former teenagers who saw them in theatres, but this one is undoubtedly a classic.

In my opinion, this is because Bring It On succeeds where others have failed in one thing: the film actually tackles some pretty big issues.

The film discusses issues of race, sexuality, and, above all, the way women and girls treat each other. All throughout the film, when another girl on the squad makes a decision someone doesn't agree with or takes a position of leadership, she is automatically labeled a "slut", "bitch", "hag", etc.

My question (and the question of so many other people) is why? Why is it that women can't engage i debate or discussion? Why must we use these horrendous, disrespectful labels and attack each other instead of actually communicating?

I think Bring It On challenges that female behavior in a really effective way. It captures the audience with a great, funny story and characters you can root for while questioning how people, specifically girls who are supposed to be working together, behave.

So here's my message: watch this movie. Laugh, root for the characters, and be entertained. After you watch the movie, reflect on why in the past you've used those words to describe somebody. Was it really necessary? Could you have used some better, more intelligent words? Did calling someone that accomplish anything? Even if you don't see the movie, instead of labelling someone, actively try to communicate your ideas the next time you disagree with someone or don't understand their point of view.

And, above all, don't forget your spirit fingers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Talking to Myself in the Mirror

I think it's a pretty safe bet that a lot of aspiring actors/writers/directors/filmy people practice their future Oscar speech in the mirror as kids. I did. Who am I kidding? I still do. It comes with the territory. My mirror talks go, ahem, went (who am I kidding? go) further. Sometimes, I do my makeup while talking to Barbara Walters. Other days, brushing my hair turns into a podcast interview. Most of the time, though, I rehearse what I'm going to say to my heroes. These hypothetical moments are incredibly important, and I can't afford to say anything stupid, so car rides, showers, and mornings getting ready are devoted to preparation. This probably makes me sound crazy. The word "narcissist" may also come to mind. I think one of my heroes would have appreciated both the crazy and the narcissism in this bit of oversharing, though, but we lost her this morning. One of my first posts on this blog was a tribute to Carrie Fisher. I read it over this afternoo

Cameron Crowe Ruined My Life

Believe me when I say that it pained me to type out the title to this post. Cameron Crowe is one of my very favorite filmmakers. To me, a guy who can write teenagers who are real people, really capture the full spectrum of human emotion, and incorporate a great soundtrack into his work is a real genius. Though it initially made me feel warm, fuzzy, and hopeful, a recent late night viewing of 2005's Elizabethtown  ended up making me a little nervous. I realized that Crowe was just like everybody else. Now, this probably doesn't make sense to those of you who admire his work. As a writer and filmmaker, Crowe definitely has a unique voice and vision that helps his work connect with all kinds of audiences. That's precisely the problem. Last week I wrote a post about how movies are only a reflection of life and not actually true to life itself. In the post, I mentioned that filmmakers are just one person with one perspective, and that is absolutely true of Crowe. In Crow

The Film List Project #2: MASH

Did you know MASH was a movie before it was a TV show? I didn't. Maybe that's a well-known fact. Maybe I'm very out of the loop. Anyway, I watched MASH this week. I'm just discovering Robert Altman, the director of the film. He made a movie in 1975 called Nashville , which I sort of felt obligated to watch since that's my hometown. I loved the film, especially because it had so many interesting characters mashed together. MASH  charmed me for the same reason. I've never been one for war films (this is set during the Korean War), but I was fascinated by the band of arrogant, witty surgeons in the film. It really didn't feel like a war film, to be honest. It felt like the Korean War was just where they happened to be. That feeling makes sense when you realize that these men and women are just trying to feel that way themselves. I don't have any personal experience with war, but I have read a few books about the subject, fiction and nonfiction, and